To ask other readers questions about The Upright Man , please sign up.
Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 3. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. Some weeks ago I read The Straw Men by Michael Marshall the first part of a trilogy by an author who has never received the acclaim and recognition that he so richly deserves. I thought The Straw Men was an excellent read and was doubtful if the style, character development, and story could be bettered in a sequel.
I need not have worried, The Lonely Dead has exceeded all my expectations, it is quite simply a stunning novel told by an expert author. Ward Hopkins, ex CIA agent, is a man with a Some weeks ago I read The Straw Men by Michael Marshall the first part of a trilogy by an author who has never received the acclaim and recognition that he so richly deserves.
The Lonely Dead (The Straw Men Trilogy, Book 2) - Michael Marshall - كتب Google
His parents had been murdered by a group that his father had belonged to 35 years earlier Whether they genuinely thought this, or it was just a convenient cover for acts of violence and depravity, was not clear. His daughter Karen was brutally murdered by him, and he seeks revenge whatever the cost.
What on the face of it seems like a complex novel is made eminently readable by a very direct and approachable writing style. This second book in the trilogy also imparts a little history on The Straw Men and it seems their ancestry reached back many hundreds of years.. Get real. They were here long before that. They got here first, Ward. This is truly a wonderful read, a thriller with elements of the supernatural, and a storyline that pulses excitement and thrills at every page.
Fler böcker av Michael Marshall
The ending when it occurs is perfect and leaves the setting poised for the third and final instalment. If you only read one thriller this year let that story be The Lonely Dead Highly highly recommended!! Mar 04, Jon Recluse rated it really liked it Shelves: thriller. The Straw Men slip back into the shadows, but their presence is still felt as the hunt for The Upright Man takes center stage in this engaging thriller.
Marshall keeps his readers on their mental toes, as they ponder who is a player, who is a pawn and who is being led down the rabbit hole. View 1 comment. Dec 08, Ctgt rated it liked it Shelves: suspense-thriller. This is what happens when you have certain expectations about a book. So what's my problem? Granted, 3 stars isn't a bad rating but I really felt like giving it 2 stars as soon as I finished. This was not the direction I wanted the book to head. How egocentric is that?
The two parts of the first book that I really enjoyed This is what happens when you have certain expectations about a book. The two parts of the first book that I really enjoyed were the idea of The Straw Men and John Zandt and neither one played prominent parts in this volume. Zandt was peripheral, popping up here and there throughout the story. There was a moment where The Straw Men were discussed in relation to the lost settlement of Roanoke and the mysterious Croatoan but that was about it.
This story was primarily about Ward and Nina and the search for the Upright Man. So this is really one of those times where I have to take the blame for not enjoying a book. If I start a book with certain ideas but the author goes in a different direction, how can I blame anyone but myself? View all 8 comments. It wasn't as good as I expected. At times, especially in the beginning, the author has a sly sense of humor that make the book entertaining.
- Spies of the American Revolution: The History of George Washingtons Secret Spying Ring (The Culper Ring)?
- Navigation menu.
- Victory Township (Images of America)?
- The Return: A Time When Nature Seeks Justice;
- Soneto da cópula esculpida (Portuguese Edition).
- Organized Religion is…!
But generally I found the book to have these faults: Too many ideas that don't tie together, inconsistency in the characters, action scenes that become cumbersome, and just too much tramping around in the woods. I was quite sick of it by the time I was done. I thought there had been some potential here, but in the end it was murky as mud and about as much It wasn't as good as I expected. I thought there had been some potential here, but in the end it was murky as mud and about as much fun. This carries straight on from the first book in the series The Straw Men and would be best read immediately afterwards.
I had a gap of about a year but could remember enough to follow the story after a few reminders. This second book has the feeling of waves washing the shore, waves created bybthe momentum and explosion of the first. Rather than generating any independent story lines of it's own. It also feels a bit disconnected, even with pages or less to go there was no apparent connection This carries straight on from the first book in the series The Straw Men and would be best read immediately afterwards.
It also feels a bit disconnected, even with pages or less to go there was no apparent connection between the two main plot lines. And I don't like the There were also a few great leaps of plot required. Infodumps of background to the. Straw Men which of course must be true since it comes second hand from an unintroduced character who plays no part in the story.
Oddly I felt the more fantastic or fable based elements were handled nicely but I have to say 'rodents of unusual size? I don't think they exist' Overall I do like Michael Marshall style.
- Lonely Dead (eBook)?
- I Will Come To You!
- The Upright Man by Michael Marshall!
- Transcendental Arguments and Scepticism: Answering the Question of Justification?
- Intervista sul potere (Saggi tascabili Laterza) (Italian Edition).
Quick to read yet rich in detail. Strong characterisations abound, even when the character isn't necessarily going to survive beyond the next page. Jul 12, Patrick rated it liked it. I really enjoyed the first book of this series. But the second two left me feeling rather lukewarm. The language wasn't nearly as clever, and the story didn't feel as compelling. I still highly recommend the first one, and think it makes a fine stand-alone story.
But I wouldn't necessarily push the second two.
Again, I should make it clear that this isn't the genre I normally read in, and my opinion should be taken with a grain of salt because of that. Jul 30, Nathalie rated it it was ok Recommended to Nathalie by: Wikipedia. Shelves: scary. After the first chapter or two, I realized that I had already read this book a couple of years ago, but as a stand-alone book, not having read "The Straw Men" yet.
At the time I found "The Upright Man" confusing and not very good. I continued on this time, hoping that having read "The Straw Men" last week would shed a different light on the sequel, this time. But no.
Sure, the great writing style is still there, but I felt no After the first chapter or two, I realized that I had already read this book a couple of years ago, but as a stand-alone book, not having read "The Straw Men" yet. Sure, the great writing style is still there, but I felt no empathy for any of the characters, no real rush to get to the bottom of the story.
For most of the book, I felt like Tom in the forest It was disappointing read. I'll read "Blood of the Angels", hoping that it will return to a better narrative, like the one of "Straw Men". Ward is looking for answers while trying to stay off the radar, Nina's back at the FBI, and John Zandt - well, he may have lost his mind. The Upright Man is still out there, somewhere, and a new plot line takes us to the Pacific Northwest, where a lost man sees something incredible.
The Lonely Dead features the same strengths that pulled me into the first book: well-developed characters, good dialogue, and mysteries that never The Lonely Dead picks up a few months after the end of The Straw Men. The Lonely Dead features the same strengths that pulled me into the first book: well-developed characters, good dialogue, and mysteries that never seem to get fully unraveled. Though I didn't love it as much as The Straw Men, the second book in this series is still excellent, and it's an enjoyable chapter in the Straw Men series.
Part 2 of the "Straw Men" trilogy is a real humdinger! If you have read Straw Men, you really need to read this! On to the third. This is a case of a British author trying to be more American than the Americans. Rather than a novel, I found this to be almost a series of chapter-long episodes which simply did not hang together as a convincing story. It was confusing and, although some of the writing was atmospheric and gripping enough, it severely tried my patience.
I am a lover of thrillers but this was more of a borer than a thriller.
The Straw Men
Jun 12, Joy rated it really liked it Shelves: series , murder-mystery , girl-power. A round about, creepy story with a secondary plot which doesn't seem to matter to the hunt for the mad killer twin. Except then it really has meaning and a strange bit of speculative fiction. I never thought I'd have given the Big Foot myth a place in murder horror! Strangely it works in a serious way and I came to believe the psychopath may not be completely delusional.
Very disappointing follow-up to The Straw Men, which I enjoyed immensely. It seemed to wander all over the place like a plot in search of a good story, but I kept reading in the hope that it would surprise me. Unfortunately, it only got worse and by the last few chapters, I felt it had become so fantastical and unbelievable that it was all I could do to bother finishing it. Shelves: fiction-murder-mystery. I sure as heck hope this book is not anywhere close as to what they are saying has been going on for 's of years as a group I won't go back to read the first one, this was the second book at it was weird enough.
Plus I didn't like how it jumped around everywhere.